Routine accounting data would be recorded permanently with a timestamp, preventing it from being altered ex-post, which Alles (2018) argues would further ensure the reliability of current accounting information systems. Real-time accounting would also reduce the potential opportunities for earnings management (Yermack, 2017). Additionally, using blockchain means anyone can review all transactions, even those that may be suspicious or related to conflicts of interest. Irreversible transactions also mean accountants could not backdate sales or report depreciation expenses in future periods when they should be expensed immediately. As a tool for accuracy and transparency, blockchain places pressure on accountants to justify their accounting choices.
Recommended articles
And going back to blockchain, things like smart contracts, that’s absolutely something where the profession needs to play a role with the SOC standard and give some level of trust that people’s smart contracts are written properly. When we look at different blockchain examples, and we brought up many times today the Walmart example, tracking food. And when you begin to watch produce and different industry verticals leveraging blockchain technology in production today, all those firms leverage participants in what changes in working capital impact cash flow the accounting profession. As blockchains allow recording and settlement of transactions to occur at the same time as the transaction itself, auditors can obtain data in real-time and in a consistent, recurring format. Monitoring what happens in real time rather than testing (selectively) and reconciling what happened in retrospect is a substantial departure from contemporary audit techniques.
- Unless existing processes and systems are truly scrutinised for their potential to benefit from blockchain technology, the full range of opportunities that blockchain presents will not be realised.
- However, the skills required of accountants are likely to change, and there may be a need for fewer entry-level accountants (Kokina and Davenport, 2017; Marrone and Hazelton, 2019).
- The inability to modify a transaction is essential for the blockchain’s integrity and ensures that all parties have accurate and identical records.
- Learn how our auditors work with Deloitte COINIA to help address blockchain.
- When we look at different blockchain examples, and we brought up many times today the Walmart example, tracking food.
- The uncertainty linked to valuing cryptoassets is affecting the development of proper regulations, as this issue affects the fundamental qualitative aspects of financial accounting, such as relevance and faithful representation.
Further, the monitoring role of accountants in managing information for the benefit of stakeholders will need to be established (Zhang et al., 2017). However, Alles (2018) warns that there is a danger of the “empirical takeover” effect when papers become empirically driven. Thus, there is a need to establish a solid theoretical and conceptual background for how blockchain will disrupt accountancy. Because blockchain eliminates the need to enter and reconcile information in multiple databases, efficiency gains are a key strength. Blockchain also saves time by increasing the speed of transactions, reducing human error and minimising fraud (Kokina et al., 2017; O’Leary, 2017). The use of smart contracts may also improve processes in a range of industries.
However, the ability to trust that both parties are recording the same base transaction information and the real-time availability of this accounting data offers immense benefits for the efficiency with which accounting data can be reconciled and analyzed. Due to distributed ledger technology, blockchain technology eliminates the need for entering accounting information into multiple databases and potentially removes the need for auditors to reconcile disparate ledgers. This could save substantial amounts of time and the risk of human error may be considerably reduced. When implemented correctly, the blockchain provides a high degree of trust, which some accountants worry will reduce demand for traditional accounting work.
There’s been firms doing work in the cryptoasset category, but now this is going to make it much wider spread. And I think as they understand how to meet the compliance needs related to cryptotax, they’re going to get a better understanding of cryptoassets, the blockchain category. And in some ways this will be a tipping point for them to go into some of the other areas that Ron just mentioned. So, to me, I’ll see the uneven evolution, and maybe people aren’t wanting to see Blockchain 101. But going forward, it will be even more critical for the profession to be involved in the conversation. As blockchain technology continues to advance and new and different uses are found, it will be up to the accountancy profession to ensure that its promises of transparency and accountability are fulfilled.
Report an issue or find answers to frequently asked questions
As a result, we see the need for a proactive regulatory framework rather than merely reacting to questions regarding the regulation and accountability of cryptoassets. There is no commonly shared point of irs where to file 1040 view among researchers on the best way to regulate cryptoassets. Some say that they fit in with the existing accounting standards, while others state there is a need to develop a new regulatory framework that will decrease the probability of fraud (Auer, 2019; Pimentel et al., 2019).
How Blockchain Will Support Accountants
Our analysis reveals that more than two-thirds of the papers under review were published in journals, while less than a third represent works in progress uploaded to SSRN. The top accounting journals from the ABS and ABDC rankings appear to be resistant to the blockchain field of research, as they have published only a few papers devoted to the technology. This could be because those journals are less friendly towards phenomenon-based research (Von Krogh et al., 2012) than fundamental research or that the publication process takes much longer, and we will see more papers in the upcoming years. Another reason could be that most existing articles are normative and are looking at the future applications of blockchain. For now, we observe that, with the blockchain landscape changing daily, and ideas and research needing to reach the target audience faster than the traditional journal route allows, researchers are turning to SSRN to share their tentative findings (Holub and Johnson, 2017). We also observe that Australian scholarship is now leading the blockchain research in accounting, as more papers were published in journals included in the ABDC ranking compared to the ABS ranking.
These can include supply chain tracking, digital rights management, real estate title transfer, and other forms of real-world asset digitalization. Deloitte COINIA is an extension of Deloitte’s award-winning Cortex platform, a cloud-based data platform that harnesses the power of data by securely and seamlessly integrating data acquisition with data preparation and analytics. It combines advanced technology with business processes to generate meaningful and valuable insights in a repeatable and consistent fashion. Researchers should analyse how blockchain ecosystems evolve and are applied (Benjaafar et al., 2018). Blockchain enables real-time, verifiable and transparent accounting, making it reasonable to assume that accounting information systems will become ecosystems.
By combining machine-learning methods with more traditional approaches, we were able to draw a holistic picture of the critical advances and trends in the corpus of literature. The results indicate that the most widely discussed topics are the changing role of accountants, new challenges for auditors, the opportunities and challenges of blockchain technology application, and the regulation of cryptoassets. It is also important to understand all the advantages and disadvantages of joining a public or a private what is work in process inventory blockchain (O’Leary, 2017). There are many different configurations of blockchain, e.g. peer-to-peer and public, cloud-based, private and these all need to be analysed before they can be soundly implemented in different settings. Further, those investigations must include analyses at the accounting, auditing and supply chain levels.
